TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Modvat credit on packing material was admissible where there were no clearances in the preceding financial year and the cost of the packing material had not been included in the earlier assessable value; (ii) Whether Modvat credit was admissible in respect of inputs used for goods exported under bond without payment of duty.
Issue (i): Whether Modvat credit on packing material was admissible where there were no clearances in the preceding financial year and the cost of the packing material had not been included in the earlier assessable value.
Analysis: The explanation to Rule 57A(1)(b)(iii) was construed in the light of the departmental trade notice clarifying that for a new unit, or a unit that had not effected clearances in the previous financial year, credit on packing material would be available if its cost was included in the assessable value. Since no clearances had been made in the preceding year, the condition of prior inclusion could not practically operate against the assessee, and the departmental clarification was binding.
Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on this issue and the denial of credit on this ground was unsustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether Modvat credit was admissible in respect of inputs used for goods exported under bond without payment of duty.
Analysis: The benefit claimed under the cited trade notice applied only to small scale units clearing goods for home consumption, which was not the assessee's case. The request was also not one for refund under the relevant refund notification, but for reversal of Modvat credit. In the absence of eligibility under the export-bond arrangement relied upon, the claim could not be allowed.
Conclusion: The assessee failed on this issue and Modvat credit was not admissible on goods exported under bond without payment of duty.
Final Conclusion: The first ground was decided for the assessee, but the second ground sustained the denial of Modvat credit, leaving the appeal dismissed overall.
Ratio Decidendi: A departmental clarification governing Modvat credit is binding where the statutory condition cannot be applied to a unit with no previous clearances, but credit cannot be claimed for exports under bond unless the applicable exemption, refund, or credit scheme specifically covers that situation.
TaxTMI 
