Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether printed shells and printed hinge lid blanks for cigarette packets were classifiable under Tariff Item 68 or Tariff Item 17(4), and whether they were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 104/82 dated 28-2-1982.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the ratio of the Larger Bench decision which had already determined that outer shells and hinge lid blanks made from printed paper board for cigarette packets fall under Tariff Item 68 and not under Tariff Item 17(3) or 17(4). On that basis, the claimed exemption under Notification No. 104/82 was not available to these products.
Conclusion: The printed shells and printed hinge lid blanks were classifiable under Tariff Item 68 and the benefit of Notification No. 104/82 was denied.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of by affirming classification under Tariff Item 68 and rejecting the exemption claim.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods manufactured from printed paper board for cigarette packets, when specifically covered by a binding larger bench ruling, must be classified according to that ruling and cannot claim an exemption that is unavailable on such classification.