Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether parts of rolling stock, locomotives and similar moving equipment used within the factory could be treated as machinery installed in the factory so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 281/86 dated 24-4-1986.
Analysis: The notification exempted excisable goods manufactured in a workshop within a factory and intended for use in that factory or another factory of the same manufacturer for repairs or maintenance of machinery installed therein. The expression "installed" was construed in its ordinary meaning as setting up, fixing or placing in position for service or use. On that basis, the Tribunal held that locomotives, rolling stock, wagons and bogies are moving items and are not machinery installed in the factory. The notification was understood to apply to machinery installed in the factory, not merely machinery used in the factory.
Conclusion: The goods did not qualify for the exemption, and the claim was rejected.