Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Dobby Cards manufactured out of films falling under CET sub-heading 39.20 were eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 39 of Notification No. 53/88 and Sl. No. 37 of Notification No. 14/92, where the notifications required the raw material to fall under sub-heading 3901 to 3915.
Analysis: The exemption was conditional upon the inputs used in manufacture falling within the specified tariff range of 3901 to 3915. The product in question was manufactured out of duty-paid films classified under Heading 39.20, which did not satisfy the stipulated condition. The same requirement continued under Notification No. 14/92, and the earlier Tribunal ruling on the point was applied. The additional plea that the goods were not marketable was also found to be without force in view of the unrebutted finding that the appellants themselves had been procuring similar Dobby Cards from other parties before installation of their own machines.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available and the appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order denying exemption was sustained, and the assessee was not entitled to relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification conditions benefit on the use of inputs falling within specified tariff sub-headings, goods manufactured from inputs outside that range are not eligible for the exemption.