Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refractory containers made of pillars, bases, settings and bats, used captively in the manufacture of tiles, were excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. as appliances or equipment.
Analysis: The goods were described as separate parts assembled for stacking raw tiles and were not a container in the ordinary sense. By themselves, the parts could not perform the function of a container, nor could they be treated as appliances or equipment. The components also got consumed in the course of use for baking tiles, showing that they functioned as inputs in manufacture rather than as excluded machinery or equipment.
Conclusion: The exclusion clause did not apply and the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was wrongly denied; the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in manufacture that consist of consumable component parts incapable of independently performing the function of a container are not to be classified as excluded appliances or equipment for denying an exemption meant for inputs.