1998 (6) TMI 185 - AT - Central Excise

Tribunal questions classification of Heavy Normal Paraffin, seeks clarity on tariff classification rules

The Tribunal disagreed with the classification of Heavy Normal Paraffin (HNP) under Heading 2710.29 and referred the matter to a Larger Bench for ... Classification Issues:Classification of Heavy Normal Paraffin (HNP) under the Customs Tariff - Whether it falls under Heading 2710.29 or 2710.99.Analysis:1. Classification Dispute: The primary issue in this case pertains to the classification of Heavy Normal Paraffin (HNP) manufactured by the respondent's Petrochemical division. The department contended that HNP should be classified under Heading 2710.99, while the assessee claimed classification under 2710.29.2. Contentions of the Parties: The department argued that HNP is distinct from kerosene covered under 2710.29 and is used in lubricating preparations, not for lighting lamps. The department highlighted that HNP's technical specifications differ from kerosene, emphasizing the need for correct classification.3. Legal Precedents: The assessee relied on a Tribunal order in the case of M/s. Indian Petrochemicals Corporation, asserting that HNP conforms to the test for materials classifiable under the old tariff's Item 7. The assessee argued that judgments under the old tariff apply to the new tariff when the taxing entry and product remain the same.4. Interpretation of Tariff Entries: The Tribunal observed that HNP is distinct from kerosene and aviation turbine fuel (ATF) covered under 2710.29. The Tribunal noted that even though HNP falls under mineral oils, it can be classified separately based on its unique characteristics.5. Comparison with Old Tariff: The Tribunal compared the new tariff entry for kerosene with the old Tariff's Item 7, emphasizing the similarity between the two entries. However, the Tribunal highlighted that changes in the law necessitate a fresh interpretation, and decisions based on the old law are not binding precedents under the new law.6. Decision and Referral: Ultimately, the Tribunal disagreed with the earlier classification of HNP under 2710.29 and referred the matter to a Larger Bench for consideration. The Tribunal sought clarification on whether HNP, previously classified under the old Tariff's Item 7, should now be categorized under 2710.29 or 2710.99 due to its distinction from kerosene.In conclusion, the judgment delves into the intricate details of tariff classification, emphasizing the need for accurate classification based on product characteristics and legal interpretations. The referral to a Larger Bench signifies the complexity of the issue and the importance of resolving classification disputes to ensure proper application of customs duties.