Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an X-ray diffractometer used in the assessee's factory was classifiable under Tariff Heading 90.30 and sub-heading 9030.10, or under Tariff Heading 90.22 and sub-heading 9022.90.
Analysis: The goods were described as an apparatus in which an X-ray beam is focussed on the material and the diffracted rays are analysed to obtain information about the solid. On that description, the apparatus was held to be based on the use of X-rays. Since Tariff Heading 90.22 specifically covers apparatus based on the use of X-rays, including other X-ray apparatus, the classification claimed by the assessee under Heading 90.30 was found unsustainable.
Conclusion: The X-ray diffractometer was held classifiable under Tariff Heading 90.22 and sub-heading 9022.90, and not under Tariff Heading 90.30 and sub-heading 9030.10, against the assessee.