Pre-deposit for penalty can be dispensed with when the penalty order lacks reasons showing the applicant's role and liability basis.

Dispensation of pre-deposit for a penalty under Rule 209A was granted because the penalty order did not give adequate reasons showing the applicants' specific role or the ingredients needed to attract the provision. On a prima facie assessment, the record did not disclose a sufficient basis to insist on deposit of the penalty before the appeal could proceed, so the penalty amount was not required to be deposited at that stage.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to dispensation of pre-deposit of the penalty imposed under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The order imposing penalty did not set out detailed reasoning establishing the applicants' specific role or the ingredients necessary for penalty under Rule 209A. On a prima facie view, the record did not disclose a sufficient basis to insist on pre-deposit of the penalty amount.

Conclusion: The applicants were granted dispensation of pre-deposit of the penalty.

Final Conclusion: The pending penalty amount was not required to be deposited before the appeal could proceed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the penalty order contains no adequate reasoning showing the specific role of the applicants or the ingredients of the penal provision, pre-deposit of the penalty may be dispensed with on a prima facie assessment.

---