Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods classifiable under Central Excise Tariff sub-heading 73.07 were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86-C.E., as amended by Notification No. 113/89-C.X.
Analysis: The amended notification was the relevant instrument for the period in dispute. On reading the amendment, goods falling under Chapter sub-heading 73.07 were included in the Schedule annexed to the notification. The dispute before the appellate authority had centred on classification, but the appellate tribunal confined itself to the exemption issue and proceeded on the admitted position that the goods were classifiable under sub-heading 73.07.
Conclusion: The goods were covered by the amended small-scale exemption notification and the assessee was entitled to the concessional benefit.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals succeeded on the exemption issue, leaving the classification question unadjudicated.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an amended exemption notification expressly covers goods under the relevant tariff heading, the assessee is entitled to the notified benefit for the period of its operation.