Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether resins and other chemicals used in the production of moulds for motor vehicle parts were eligible inputs under the Modvat credit scheme.
Analysis: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee by prior Tribunal decisions, including a Larger Bench ruling that such chemicals qualified as inputs. The mere fact that a similar question had been referred to the High Court did not displace the binding effect of the Tribunal's ratio on the issue decided on merits.
Conclusion: The chemicals were held to be eligible inputs for Modvat credit, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order recognising Modvat credit eligibility for the chemicals was affirmed and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A prior reasoned decision on the merits of an issue continues to govern unless displaced, and a pending reference of a similar question to the High Court does not by itself negate the binding force of that ratio.