Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether empty containers used for storing inputs and cleared after the inputs were consumed were dutiable as goods arising in the course of manufacture, or whether the assessee remained entitled to Modvat credit without reversal.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of the containers after the inputs had been used. The deciding authority followed the earlier view that the Board had given a beneficial clarification permitting full Modvat credit even where the value of the containers had been taken into account by the input manufacturer, and that no reversal or proportionate reduction of credit was required when the containers later became scrap. It was held that containers in which raw materials were received could not be treated as waste arising out of processing of inputs so as to attract the duty demand under Rule 57F(5)(a), and the beneficial interpretation adopted in prior precedent was applied.
Conclusion: The demand was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit; the appeal succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the assessee obtained consequential relief on the footing that the emptied containers were not liable to duty as waste arising from manufacture.
Ratio Decidendi: Where containers used to receive inputs are cleared only after the inputs are consumed, they are not to be treated as waste arising from processing of inputs, and Modvat credit is not to be reversed absent a contrary statutory mandate.