Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on duplex board used for making printed cartons meant for packing torches and miniature bulbs, when the cartons were treated as a separate exempted product.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts and the High Court ruling that packing material used in relation to the manufacture and marketing of the final product forms part of the manufacturing process. The Tribunal noted that packing is incidental or ancillary to completion of the manufactured product and that containers used for packing a final product are to be treated as a component part of that product for credit purposes.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the duplex board was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the order denying Modvat credit was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Material used for packing the final product, where packing is integral to completion and marketing of the product, is eligible for Modvat credit as part of the manufacturing process.