Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sample test results showing the presence of man-made fibres of non-cellulosic origin could be applied to the remaining quantity for the relevant period, and whether the yarn was classifiable under Tariff Entry 18(iii)(ii) instead of 18(iii)(i).
Analysis: The relevant tariff entry distinguished between yarn not containing man-made fibres of non-cellulosic origin and yarn containing such fibres. The sample results indicated that the goods contained man-made fibres of non-cellulosic origin. No fresh sample was drawn to displace that result, and no substantial evidence was produced to show that the remaining quantity differed in composition. On that basis, the sample results were treated as applicable to the remaining quantity until a new sample was drawn, and the contrary line of cases relied on for the assessee was found inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The yarn was correctly classifiable under Tariff Entry 18(iii)(ii), and the sample results could be applied to the remaining quantity for the period in question.