Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product manufactured by the appellant was a prepared adhesive based on plastics so as to attract the duty treatment under Notification No. 125/87, and whether re-testing of the sample was warranted.
Analysis: The Chemical Examiner's report specifically recorded that the sample was composed of nitrocellulose, epoxy type synthetic resins, plasticiser and volatile solvents, and concluded that it was a prepared adhesive based on plastics. The classification was supported by reference to Chapter 39 of the tariff and the corresponding HSN treatment of cellulose nitrates and related materials. As the report was clear, specific and founded on chemical testing, it could not be treated as presumptive or self-contradictory. In these circumstances, no basis existed for directing re-testing of the sample.
Conclusion: The product was correctly treated as a prepared adhesive based on plastics, the higher duty under the notification was rightly demanded, and the refusal to re-test did not vitiate the order.