Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amounts received by shareholder assessees from the liquidator of a foreign company on liquidation were taxable as income under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and whether section 14(2)(b) affected that liability.
Analysis: The distribution made by the liquidator represented the assets of the company in liquidation and not income earned by the shareholders. On liquidation, the distinction between capital and revenue in the hands of the company's assets could not convert the shareholders' receipts into income merely because a part of the distribution might be referable to accumulated profits. The deeming provision treating certain liquidation distributions as dividend applied only to a company within the statutory definition and did not govern a foreign company in the present setting. Section 14(2)(b) was an exemption provision and did not operate as a charging provision to impose tax merely because the association had not paid tax.
Conclusion: The amounts received by the assessees were not taxable income in their hands, and the reference was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessees.
Final Conclusion: Receipts by shareholders from the liquidation of the foreign company were held to be capital distributions and not chargeable as income.
Ratio Decidendi: A liquidation distribution to shareholders is not income in their hands unless the statute clearly brings it within a charging provision applicable to them; an exemption provision cannot by itself create tax liability.