Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the discount allowed to regional distributors was deductible as trade discount in determining assessable value, or whether it was liable to be treated as commission paid to consignment agents and therefore disallowed.
Analysis: The distributors purchased the goods at agreed prices, were allowed trade discount, and the transactions were on a principal to principal basis at arm's length. There was no material to show any flow of additional consideration from the distributors to the manufacturer. The obligation on distributors to promote sales and to adhere to the price limits fixed for resale did not alter the character of the transactions, and the agreements indicated that the goods sold to distributors were not to be taken back by the manufacturer. These features showed that the distributors were wholesale buyers and not consignment agents.
Conclusion: The discount paid to the distributors was admissible for deduction and could not be treated as commission.
Final Conclusion: The department's challenge to the deduction of trade discount failed, and the orders allowing the deduction were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where distributors purchase goods on principal to principal terms at arm's length, without any additional consideration flowing back to the manufacturer, the discount allowed to them is deductible as trade discount and cannot be recharacterised as commission.