TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands matter for further verification and speaking order, condoning procedural lapses with substantive compliance.</h1> <h3>UNISEF ELECTRONICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MEERUT</h3> UNISEF ELECTRONICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MEERUT - 1998 (101) E.L.T. 514 (Tribunal) The appeal was filed against the rejection of a request for condonation of delay in filing a declaration under Rule 57G. The appellants were engaged in job work for branded goods and their own manufacturing, seeking to switch to the Modvat scheme. The Assistant Commissioner rejected their request citing insufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal held that delays in such applications are condonable procedural lapses if substantive compliance is shown. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner for further verification and a speaking order.
TaxTMI 