Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund was admissible when waste and scrap of copper were cleared at nil rate of duty on the basis of an approved classification list, despite Modvat credit having been taken on the inputs and later reversed.
Analysis: The waste and scrap were cleared under an approved classification list which separately reflected the nil rate of duty, with a specific remark that input credit would not be taken. The record showed that Modvat credit on the copper wire rods had already been availed and that the scrap was nevertheless removed at nil rate. Under Notification No. 172/84-C.E., waste and scrap of copper was exempt only in the stated circumstances, while the amended Notification No. 246/87-C.E. was not treated as the sole basis for refund. Since the duty position had been regularised by reversal of the Modvat credit and the assessment rested on an approved classification list, no interference with the lower authority's view was warranted.
Conclusion: Refund was not admissible and the claim failed.