Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on inputs that had entered the manufacturing process and were destroyed by fire at the coating stage before the final product emerged.
Analysis: The inputs had admittedly been declared for Modvat purposes and had been put to intended use within the manufacturing process. The fire occurred at the coating stage, which formed an integral part of manufacture, and the expression "used in the manufacture of goods" was held to cover the full process of conversion of raw material into finished goods. Rule 57F(3) was applied on the footing that credit could be utilised for inputs intended to be used, and Rule 57D supported protection of credit in relation to waste arising in the course of manufacture. The quantity destroyed as such had already been reversed, so the credit in dispute related to inputs that had actually entered the manufacturing stream.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible, and the order denying relief was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee retained the Modvat benefit on the disputed inputs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs have been put to intended use in an integral stage of manufacture, destruction of the process goods by fire before emergence of the final product does not, by itself, require denial of Modvat credit.