Machine cutting blades classification determined exemption eligibility, with mounted roughing blades excluded from interchangeable tools treatment.

Imported roughing blades designed to be mounted on gear cutting machinery were treated as machine cutting blades rather than interchangeable tools. On the tariff and HSN notes, the articles fell under Chapter Heading 8208.10, not Chapter Heading 8207.90, because they were not independently interchangeable tools within Chapter 82. That classification also defeated the claimed exemption under Notification No. 69/87-Cus., with assessment instead governed by Notification No. 68/87-Cus. The stated ratio is that blades intended for machine mounting must be classified by their machine-cutting function and then tested against the notification exclusions applicable to that tariff treatment.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the imported roughing blades were classifiable as interchangeable tools under Chapter Heading 8207.90 or as knives and cutting blades under Chapter Heading 8208.10 read with Chapter Heading 8461.40 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1985. (ii) Whether the goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 69/87-Cus. or assessable under Notification No. 68/87-Cus.

Issue (i): Whether the imported roughing blades were classifiable as interchangeable tools under Chapter Heading 8207.90 or as knives and cutting blades under Chapter Heading 8208.10 read with Chapter Heading 8461.40 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1985.

Analysis: The imported articles were found, on the basis of the technical literature, catalogue, description in the bill of entry, and the tariff and HSN notes, to be roughing blades meant to be mounted on gear cutting apparatus. They were not interchangeable tools within Chapter 82. The heading for knives and cutting blades for machines or mechanical appliances was held to cover blades used for metal working, including blades fitted into machine tools.

Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Chapter Heading 8208.10 and not under Chapter Heading 8207.90.

Issue (ii): Whether the goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 69/87-Cus. or assessable under Notification No. 68/87-Cus.

Analysis: Following the earlier tribunal reasoning applied in the case relied upon, the goods, even if otherwise falling within the tariff scheme considered, did not qualify for the benefit of Notification No. 69/87-Cus. by reason of the exclusion applicable to such tools. The classification adopted therefore led to denial of exemption claimed under that notification.

Conclusion: The goods were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 69/87-Cus. and were assessable under Notification No. 68/87-Cus.

Final Conclusion: The appellate challenge to the customs classification and exemption denial failed, and the lower appellate order was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where imported blades are designed to be mounted on machinery and are not independently interchangeable tools, they are classifiable as machine cutting blades rather than interchangeable tools, and the applicable exemption notification must be tested in light of that tariff classification and its exclusions.

---