Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amended Section 11B of the Central Excise Act applied retrospectively to refund claims pending in appeal and entitled a buyer who had paid duty on exempt goods to seek refund.
Analysis: The amended refund provision was held to govern claims pending not only before the original authority but also before the appellate authority. The buyer, having paid duty on goods which were subsequently found to be exempt, was treated as entitled to claim refund under the amended provision. The rejection of the claim by the lower authorities on the ground that the appellants were not the manufacturers was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The refund claim was maintainable under the amended Section 11B and the matter was remanded to the Assistant Collector for decision in accordance with that provision.