RG-1 accounting for fully manufactured goods upheld, with confiscation, redemption fine and penalty sustained for non-accountal.

Fully manufactured fluorescent lighting tubes that had been packed after completion of testing were held to have reached the stage for entry in RG-1, and the competing claim that they awaited further quality control was rejected. On that footing, non-accountal attracted confiscation. The redemption fine and penalty were also found proportionate to the value of the goods and the nature of the lapse, with no adequate basis shown for reduction. The confiscation and monetary consequences were therefore sustained, and the appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the seized fluorescent lighting tubes were fully manufactured and liable to be entered in the RG-1 register, making them liable to confiscation for non-accountal; (ii) Whether the redemption fine and penalty were excessive and called for reduction.

Issue (i): Whether the seized fluorescent lighting tubes were fully manufactured and liable to be entered in the RG-1 register, making them liable to confiscation for non-accountal.

Analysis: The goods were found fully packed and the record showed that they had reached the stage where they were required to be entered in RG-1. The claimed need for further quality control testing was not accepted, as the factual findings recorded that packing had been done after the relevant tests and the goods were not awaiting completion of manufacture. The competing references to the trade notice and the basic manual did not alter the conclusion that the goods had attained the stage for accounting in RG-1.

Conclusion: The goods were liable to confiscation for non-accountal, against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the redemption fine and penalty were excessive and called for reduction.

Analysis: The value of the seized goods was about Rs. 7 lakhs, while the redemption fine and penalty imposed were found to be proportionate to the value of the goods and the nature of the lapse. No satisfactory basis was shown for reducing either amount.

Conclusion: The redemption fine and penalty were not excessive and were upheld, against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The confiscation of the goods and the accompanying monetary consequences were sustained, and the appeal failed in full.

Ratio Decidendi: Goods that have reached the stage of full manufacture and are packed cannot be treated as awaiting further processing to avoid statutory accounting requirements, and confiscation with proportionate redemption fine and penalty is justified where non-accountal is established.

---