Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported super vacuum packing machine was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 70/81 when the institution was certified as a research institution not engaged in commercial activity, and whether charging fees for services or the distinction between public-funded and private research institutions could defeat the exemption.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 70/81 applied to scientific and technical instruments imported by research institutions, subject to the prescribed certificates. The notified certificate stated that the institution was a research institution, that the import was essential for research, and that the institution was not engaged in commercial activity. The charging of fees merely towards reimbursement of expenses did not amount to commercial activity. In the absence of evidence from the Revenue, the Customs authorities could not disregard the notified certificate or deny the claim on the basis that the goods were not scientific and technical instruments. The notification also did not draw any distinction between public-funded and privately funded research institutions.
Conclusion: The exemption was available and the Revenue's challenge failed.