Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the disputed duty and penalty should be dispensed with pending appeal on the claim of capital goods Modvat credit under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The eligibility of the chlorine cylinders for capital goods Modvat credit depended on a detailed examination of their design and their role in the manufacturing process. That exercise could not be undertaken at the stay stage. The cited Commissioner's decision was not binding, and the Tribunal decision relied on did not concern Rule 57Q. On that basis, only partial relief in the form of a conditional deposit was justified.
Conclusion: The application for complete waiver was not accepted, but the applicant was granted partial dispensation on condition of depositing Rs. 10,00,000 and the balance of duty and penalty was stayed.