Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the medicinal products, marked with symbols on cartons and labels, were patent or proprietary medicaments classifiable under sub-heading 3003.10, or whether they remained classifiable under sub-heading 3003.20.
Analysis: Chapter Note 2(ii) to Chapter 30 brings within its scope not only a registered trade mark or brand name, but also any other mark, symbol, monogram, label, signature, invented word or writing used in relation to the medicine so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the medicine and some person entitled to use that mark. The decisive question was whether the markings in the present case actually established such a trade connection. The markings were found to be mere symbols on cartons and labels, and the record did not show evidence that they were associated in the market with the manufacturer or used as a brand or product mark. The fact that the supplies were made for hospitals did not by itself attract the mischief of the note. In the absence of proof that the markings indicated a trade connection, the department's classification as patent or proprietary medicaments could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The products were not patent or proprietary medicaments and were correctly classifiable under sub-heading 3003.20, not under sub-heading 3003.10.