Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 131/81 applied to platinum articles remade from old or used platinum articles even when the assessee was not undertaking job work for customers.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption to articles of specified precious metals remade from old or used articles of the same metal. The eligibility part of the notification was clear and was not cut down by the later words referring to the value of materials added and the amount charged for remaking. Those words were held to relate only to the method of computing the extent of exemption and not to restrict the class of eligible articles. The fact that the assessee remade old platinum articles and sold the finished articles on its own account did not take the case outside the notification.
Conclusion: The notification applied to the assessee and the impugned orders rejecting the exemption were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the orders below were set aside, with refund relief remaining subject to the statutory requirements governing refund claims.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification clearly covers articles remade from old or used precious metal articles, the computation language in the exemption clause cannot be used to narrow the substantive eligibility granted by the opening part of the notification.