Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cost of outside-agency inspection of industrial valves was liable to be added to the assessable value in cases where such inspection was actually conducted, and whether any addition could be made where no such inspection was undertaken.
Analysis: The appeal was unsupported by evidence on the claim that most valves were in fact subjected to outside inspection under contractual or safety requirements. The challenged order had drawn a distinction between cases where inspection was conducted and cases where it was not, and that basic approach was not shown to be erroneous. The question whether a particular batch of valves was inspected was treated as a matter of factual determination by the departmental authority.
Conclusion: The cost of outside-agency inspection was to be added to the assessable value only where such inspection was actually carried out, and no addition was permissible where no inspection took place. The appeal failed and was dismissed.