Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether forged products cleared by the assessee were classifiable as pieces roughly shaped under Heading 7208 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 208/83-C.E. dated 01-08-1983, or whether they were articles of iron and steel under Heading 7209.90 and outside the exemption.
Analysis: The classification dispute had already been settled by prior Tribunal decisions concerning similar forged goods for the relevant period, holding that pieces roughly shaped by rolling or forging of iron or steel are not articles of iron and steel. The Tribunal also noted that those decisions had considered the earlier judicial authorities and the applicability of Rule 2(a) of the Rules for the Interpretation of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The goods remained in forged condition and had not acquired the essential characteristics of an article, with further processing being done by the buyers. The Tribunal further noted that the department had itself dropped subsequent proceedings on the same issue.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Heading 7208 and not under Heading 7209.90, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification.