Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported sensor lower explosive limit catalytic was correctly classifiable under Heading No. 8531.90 of the Customs Tariff as a part of an alarm or gas detection and monitoring system, or under Heading No. 9027.90 as an instrument or apparatus for physical or chemical analysis, and whether Notification No. 172/89-Cus. dated 29-5-1989 was applicable.
Analysis: The imported goods were admittedly a sensor forming part of the gas detection and monitoring system manufactured by the appellant. Viewed independently, the sensor was not an instrument or apparatus for physical or chemical analysis and did not itself measure or check quantities of gas within the meaning of Heading No. 90.27. Since the complete gas detection and monitoring system was not classifiable under Heading No. 90.27, its parts could not be brought under sub-heading No. 9027.90. The sensor was instead a component of the gas detection system, which was classifiable under Heading No. 85.31, and the supporting classification also accorded with the explanatory notes distinguishing gas alarms from gas analysis apparatus. As the goods were not classifiable under sub-heading No. 9027.90, the exemption notification for that heading was not available.
Conclusion: The sensor was correctly classifiable under Heading No. 8531.90 and not under Heading No. 9027.90, and the exemption notification did not apply.