Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could elect not to avail the conditional exemption on captively consumed intermediate goods, pay duty on such goods, take credit of the duty so paid, and utilise that credit for payment of duty on the final products.
Analysis: The exemption in question applied only to goods captively consumed and was therefore conditional in nature. On the facts, the intermediate product was in fact subjected to duty, and the credit of that duty was taken and used towards duty liability on the final products. The case was treated as materially similar to an earlier decision of the Tribunal dealing with an optional conditional exemption. In such circumstances, the intermediate product had to be regarded as duty paid, and the credit could not be treated as irregular merely because the goods were otherwise capable of exemption.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to pay duty on the intermediate product, avail credit of that duty, and use the credit for payment of duty on the final products; the demand was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption is conditional and optional in effect, an assessee may choose to pay duty on the captively consumed intermediate product, and such payment renders the input duty paid for purposes of credit and utilisation against duty on the final product.