Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the credit balance earned under Notification No. 103/61, after the notification had been rescinded, could be transferred to the Modvat credit account under Rule 57H(3) of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The credit earned under the notification did not lapse merely because the notification was rescinded. The respondent had opted for Modvat soon after its introduction, but the entitlement under Notification No. 103/61 remained in dispute and was resolved only later. In that situation, the respondent could seek the transitional facility only after the dispute was concluded, and the accumulated set-off had to be treated as credit lying in balance immediately before the relevant Modvat declaration. The earlier Tribunal view supporting transfer of balance credit under the transitional provision was followed, while the revenue's reliance on a different precedent was distinguished on facts.
Conclusion: The accumulated credit was transferable under Rule 57H(3), and the order allowing such transfer was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit accumulated under a rescinded exemption notification does not lapse where the entitlement is later upheld, and such credit may be carried into Modvat under the transitional provision if it is treated as lying in balance immediately before the declaration.