Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the inclusion of demurrage charges, wharfage charges and stock loss in the assessable value could be sustained without examining the terms of the high sea sale contract and the statutory parameters for valuation under the Customs law.
Analysis: The appeal raised the question whether a high sea sale could be treated as a transaction in the course of international trade for valuation purposes and whether the disputed charges could be added to the price actually paid or payable. The available record did not contain the contract, and the lower appellate order did not examine the nature and modalities of the transaction in the light of Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The applicable valuation scheme permits only specified additions and requires objective and quantifiable data, while also containing an express restriction against additions except as provided in the rule. In the absence of such examination and evidence, the matter required reconsideration.
Conclusion: The issue was not finally decided on merits and was sent back for fresh examination after hearing the parties and considering the relevant documents.