Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product Moisturex was classifiable as a medicament under sub-heading 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or as a cosmetic preparation under Heading 33.04 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The product was found to contain urea, lactic acid and other ingredients in a formulation indicated for ichthyosis vulgaris, fissure foot and dry scaly skin conditions. The label and product literature showed use for treating dry skin disorders, with directions for application to the affected area and dosage guidance for medical use. The evidence, including medical affidavits and pharmaceutical material, supported that urea was present in therapeutic quantity and that the formulation was intended for treatment of skin disorders rather than for cleansing, beautifying or promoting attractiveness. In these circumstances, the product satisfied the definition of medicament and did not fall within the scope of a cosmetic merely because the ingredients may also have cosmetic applications.
Conclusion: Moisturex was held classifiable as a medicament under sub-heading 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and not as a cosmetic under Heading 33.04.