Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed due to failure to prove charges incurred post-clearance were separate. Assessable value affected.</h1> The appeal was dismissed as the party failed to substantiate that forwarding charges, Angadia charges, and testing charges were incurred outside the ... Valuation The judgment concerns the addition of forwarding charges, Angadia charges, and testing charges to the assessable value. The party failed to provide evidence that these charges were incurred outside the factory after goods were cleared. As a result, the charges were included in the assessable value. The appeal was dismissed as the issue was not substantiated by the party.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
