Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to Modvat credit under Rule 57H on inputs used in the manufacture of final products cleared before filing the declaration under Rule 57G, where the final products had been cleared on or after 1-3-1987.
Analysis: Rule 57H was a transitional provision intended to extend credit in respect of duty-paid inputs where the manufacturer had not yet obtained acknowledgment of the declaration under Rule 57G. The provision contained two limbs: one relating to inputs lying in stock or received after filing the declaration, and the other relating to inputs already used in the manufacture of final products cleared from the factory on or after 1-3-1987. The Tribunal followed the cited High Court view that the rule was designed to grant credit for such qualifying inputs and that the second limb was not excluded merely because the declaration had been filed later.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to Modvat credit under Rule 57H, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.