Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in valuing captively consumed geared motors under the excise valuation rules, the gross profit earned on the final product could be mechanically adopted as the margin of profit for the intermediate product.
Analysis: The dispute concerned determination of assessable value for geared motors captively consumed in the manufacture of signal machines. The valuation was to be made on cost elements with an appropriate margin of profit where comparable price was unavailable. The reasoning rejected a mechanical adoption of the gross profit shown on the final product, because the intermediate product and the final product may differ in nature, marketability, and profitability. The order under challenge proceeded on the footing that the margin of profit had been determined after considering the nature of the two products and other relevant factors affecting profitability.
Conclusion: The gross profit on the final product could not be mechanically applied, and the adoption of 10.1% margin of profit on the captively consumed product was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The valuation determination was sustained and the challenge to the impugned order failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In valuing captively consumed goods under the excise valuation rules, margin of profit must be fixed with reference to the relevant characteristics of the captively consumed product and cannot be mechanically lifted from the profit earned on the final product.