Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sulphuric acid used in the manufacture of zinc sulphate was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 81/75-C.E. on the footing that zinc sulphate is used as a fertiliser.
Analysis: The exemption notification applied where sulphuric acid was used in the manufacture of fertilisers. Although Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 31 treats "other fertilisers" as products containing nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium as an essential constituent, zinc sulphate was recognised as a micronutrient used in agriculture and as a fertiliser for plant growth. The Tribunal relied on earlier precedent and the binding character of the Board's circular, which treated micronutrients listed in the Fertiliser Control Order, 1985 as classifiable under Heading 31.05. For the purpose of the exemption, the decisive factor was the use of zinc sulphate as a fertiliser, not its precise tariff classification.
Conclusion: The sulphuric acid used in the manufacture of zinc sulphate qualified for the exemption, and the departmental appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For a use-based exemption, the relevant inquiry is whether the end product is used as a fertiliser, and not whether it strictly satisfies the tariff description of fertiliser under Chapter Note 6.