Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Mixed Xylene cleared under the concessional notification remained eligible for exemption when it was repacked and sent to another factory without undergoing manufacture, so as to satisfy the condition of use as solvent or diluent in the manufacture of paints or allied materials.
Analysis: The notification granted concessional duty only when the jurisdictional authority was satisfied that the material was intended for use as a solvent or diluent or thinner in the manufacture of paints, varnishes, lacquers or allied materials. The admitted facts showed that the Mixed Xylene received by the appellant was not subjected to any manufacturing process, but was only repacked into smaller drums and transferred to another factory. The record did not show that repacking amounted to manufacture, and the appellant itself accepted that no process was undertaken on the material before removal. The cited precedent was distinguishable because that case involved a manufacturing process that resulted in thinner, whereas here the material was cleared as such. The essential condition of the notification was therefore not met.
Conclusion: The concessional exemption was not available, and the demand and penalty were sustained.