Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Turn-Over Unit, Billet Feeding Arrangement, Sprue-Cutting Device and Scissors Lift, used within the assessee's factory, were excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 118/75-C.E. as complete machinery meant for producing or processing goods.
Analysis: The exclusion clause in the exemption notification had to be construed strictly. The expression "complete machinery" was not confined to a group of machines and could apply even to an individual machine, but the machine had to be one meant for producing or processing goods itself. The Turn-Over Unit, Billet Feeding Arrangement and Scissors Lift merely handled, lifted or turned materials without bringing about any change in the goods. The Sprue-Cutting Device was used on a sand-mould, and a sand-mould was not goods; therefore, its use did not amount to processing of goods.
Conclusion: All four items were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 118/75-C.E., and the denial of exemption was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded in full, with consequential relief, and no duty liability or penalty survived.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification excluding complete machinery meant for producing or processing goods is to be strictly construed, and equipment that merely handles material without effecting processing of goods does not fall within the exclusion.