Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether high density polyethylene granules used to manufacture plastic containers for packing the appellant's medicines are inputs within the meaning of Rule 57A and are not excluded by its Explanation.
Analysis: The plastic containers were used for packing the medicines manufactured by the appellant. The granules were consumed in making those containers, and the containers functioned as an intermediary in relation to the final product. On the reasoning adopted by the higher court in the cited packing-material context, the granules used to manufacture such containers qualified as inputs for the final products.
Conclusion: Yes. The HDPE granules were inputs under Rule 57A and were not excluded by the Explanation.
Ratio Decidendi: Material used to manufacture an intermediary packing container used for the assessee's final product is an input for the final product where the container forms part of the manufacturing chain contemplated by Rule 57A.