Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of excise duty was admissible on the ground that the price of detergent powder was reduced after approval of the price list and clearance of the goods.
Analysis: The approved Part II price list did not disclose any contractual stipulation for escalation or de-escalation of price, nor did it indicate that the declared price could vary on the basis of later correspondence. In the absence of any such disclosed variation mechanism in the price list itself, the later reduction in price could not be retrospectively applied so as to alter the duty position already fixed on the basis of the approved declaration. The cited decisions dealing with price lists containing built-in provisions for price variation were therefore inapplicable.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not admissible and the rejection of the claim was . The appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an approved price list does not disclose any provision for price escalation or de-escalation, a subsequent reduction in the sale price does not entitle the assessee to refund of duty already paid on the approved declared price.