Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 174/89 dated 01.09.1989, which amended Notification No. 175/86 dated 01.03.1986 by excluding clearances of branded goods of another person from the previous year's aggregate value, applied to clearances made in April and May 1989.
Analysis: The amendment altered the method of computing the aggregate value of clearances in the previous year, and that computation governed eligibility for exemption in the relevant financial year. Once the previous year's value was recomputed by excluding clearances of goods bearing another person's brand name, the revised criterion necessarily affected clearances made in the running year. The amendment was therefore treated as relating to the basis of eligibility rather than merely operating only from the date of its issue.
Conclusion: The amendment had retrospective effect for the purpose of determining exemption eligibility for the relevant year, and the benefit was available to the clearances made in April and May 1989. The appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification amends the computation of the previous year's aggregate value of clearances for determining eligibility in the current year, the amended criterion governs that current year's clearances and operates retrospectively for that limited purpose.