Liberal construction of "shop" under ESI coverage extends to clearing and forwarding establishments providing commercial services.

A clearing and forwarding establishment performing stevedoring, document-processing and related commercial services is treated as a "shop" for the purposes of an Employees' State Insurance notification when the statutory context calls for a liberal construction. The term is not confined to premises where goods are bought and sold; it extends to establishments carrying on systematic commercial activity and customer service. The presence of other listed establishments, such as hotels and restaurants, does not narrow that meaning or require exhaustive enumeration of similar businesses. On that analysis, the appellant's establishment falls within the notification and the Act applies.

---

---

Issues: Whether a clearing and forwarding establishment carrying on stevedoring, document-processing and related commercial services falls within the expression "shop" in the notification issued under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, so as to attract the Act's extension to such establishments.

Analysis: The Act is a social security and welfare legislation, and the notification extending its benefits to specified classes of establishments must receive a liberal construction to advance its object. The word "shop" is not confined to premises where goods are merely bought and sold; in the context of the notification and the statutory scheme, it extends to establishments where commercial activity and customer service are carried on. The fact that the notification separately mentions other establishments such as hotels, restaurants and similar entities does not narrow the meaning of "shop" or require a specific enumeration of every comparable business activity. The appellant's clearing and forwarding operations were held to involve systematic commercial activity and service rendered to exporters and importers.

Conclusion: The appellant's establishment is covered by the expression "shop" under the notification, and the Act applies to it. The challenge fails.

---