Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight and transit insurance could be included in the assessable value for central excise duty merely because the assessee had opted for assessment under Notification No. 120/75 dated 30-4-1975.
Analysis: Notification No. 120/75 was treated as an exemption notification granting partial relief from duty and not as a basis for enlarging the assessable value beyond the scope of Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Freight and insurance were held to be outside the purview of assessable value under Section 4, and their inclusion could not be justified on the ground that invoice value had been adopted under the notification.
Conclusion: Freight and transit insurance were not includible in the assessable value, and the demand raised on that basis was unsustainable in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where Section 4 governs valuation, freight and insurance cannot be added to assessable value merely because the assessee availed partial exemption under Notification No. 120/75 dated 30-4-1975.