Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether diamond gang saw blades were correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 68.01/16(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or under Chapter Heading 82.01/04 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the issue of classification had already been decided by earlier Tribunal decisions in favour of the Revenue. Those decisions held that the impugned goods fall under Chapter Heading 82.01/04 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and not under Chapter Heading 68.01/16(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. In light of the settled position, the contrary classification adopted in the impugned order could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 82.01/04 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.