Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sulphuric acid cleared without payment of duty was eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E.
Analysis: The entitlement to the notification had already been decided in an earlier Tribunal decision involving the same product and the same parties. That decision had examined the manufacturing process and the use of sulphuric acid and had granted the exemption. The departmental challenge to that decision had been dismissed by the Supreme Court, leaving no surviving ground to reopen the same question.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was applicable, and the departmental appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal treated the controversy as settled by the earlier binding decision and declined to disturb the exemption granted to the assessee.