Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the blended yarn manufactured by the assessee was classifiable under Tariff Item 18-III(ii) or, in the alternative, Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The blended yarn contained polyester, viscose and silk. The applicable classification question had already been settled by the Supreme Court in respect of similar blended yarn. That ruling held that such yarn did not fall under Tariff Item 18-III(ii) or Tariff Item 18-E and was correctly classifiable under the residuary Tariff Item 68 for goods not elsewhere specified. As the same reasoning applied to the present goods, the impugned classification could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The blended yarn was held classifiable under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff and not under Tariff Item 18-III(ii).
Final Conclusion: The classification order was set aside and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where blended yarn does not answer the specific tariff description relied upon, it is classifiable under the residuary entry for goods not elsewhere specified.