Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether diaphragm bags, air bags and curing bags used in tyre manufacture were eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The goods were used during vulcanisation to give shape to tyres and were repeatedly used until worn out. The dispute had already been considered in earlier Tribunal and Supreme Court decisions on materially identical facts, where such items were treated as inputs used in or in relation to manufacture. In view of that binding approach, the contrary view that they were equipment was not accepted.
Conclusion: The items were held to be eligible inputs and Modvat credit was admissible.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the order allowing credit in favour of the manufacturer was maintained.
Ratio Decidendi: Items used during the manufacturing process, even if repeatedly employed until wear and tear, qualify as inputs when they are used in or in relation to manufacture and the issue is governed by binding precedent on identical facts.