Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were justified in view of the assessee's prima facie case under Rule 57D(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The order records that the assessee had raised several contentions, including reliance on prior Tribunal decisions dealing with defective and damaged pieces arising in manufacture as waste and scrap. It also notes that the lower authorities had not dealt with all the contentions and had not passed speaking orders. On prima facie consideration, the Tribunal found that the issue was covered by the cited ruling and by Rule 57D(1), and therefore the assessee had made out a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, in favour of the assessee.