Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether parts of petrol pumps classified under Heading 84.13 were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 155/86.
Analysis: The exemption notification was construed strictly. The tariff entry referred to pumps, but the notification did not use the word parts. In the absence of an express reference to parts, the benefit could not be extended by interpretation merely because the tariff heading and the goods description were said to be identical. The requested application of harmonious construction was rejected in view of the plain language of the notification.
Conclusion: The parts of petrol pumps were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 155/86.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be construed strictly, and where the notification does not expressly cover parts, exemption cannot be extended to parts by interpretative reasoning.